Thursday, July 28, 2005

Liberals - stupid is as stupid does

Ann Coulter once wrote:
"When you are able to articulate an opposing opinion, you are an adult. When you can't, you are a liberal".
Ms. Coulter was so right. Along the same lines, see the article by Cheri Pierson Yecke, at:
Liberals can't seem to deal with facts, I guess because their arguments seldom rely on them.
Credit to Michelle Malkin.

Thursday's Thought

The fear of the LORD is the beginning of wisdom.

Psalm 111:10

Monday, July 25, 2005

Anita Hill - Who Cares?

Today I read that Anita "he was so mean to me" Hill is unhappy with President Bush's nomination of John Roberts for the Supreme Court of the United States. (see, She's afraid that Roberts' confirmation to the SCOTUS will lead to "an all-white-male Supreme Court". Now that seems to be a very sexist and racist thing to pronounce. But, we are talking about the poster child of failed sexual harassment accusers.
I see that Ms. Hill is now a professor of law, social policy and women's studies at Brandeis University. Why is it liberal lefties become professor's when they fail at so many other things? And why is it that women who seem to be so weak always teach women's studies? I guess the saying is true: Those who can't do, teach.

Thursday, July 21, 2005

Thursday's Thought

Man cannot be separated from God, nor politics from morality.
Pope John Paul II

Wednesday, July 20, 2005

Rest In Peace Scotty

James Doohan, aka Scotty on Star Trek (the original series) died today, Wednesday, July 20, 2005, of pneumonia and Alzheimer's. He was 85. Scotty played a hero on Star Trek, and he lived a hero's life during World War 2. He landed on Juno Beach on D-Day.
He was shot 6 times by a machine gun. One bullet took off a finger, 4 hit him in the leg, and 1 hit him in the chest. That bullet was stopped by his silver cigarette case. Debbie Schlussel ( has posted a nice write up about Mr. Doohan.

This photo is from hollywood_heros.html

Tuesday, July 19, 2005

Knee Jerk Reactionaries

The Democrats prove themselves to be knee jerk reactionaries. Again. President Bush announces his pick for the open position on the SCOTUS, and before the t.v. cameras and lights can cool down, Senators Patrick Leahy and Charles Schumer are picking a fight in response.
Why is it that President Bill Clinton was able to have his extremist nominee, Ruth Bader Ginsberg, confirmed, but President Bush will have to fight an ugly battle in order to confirm a talented, level-headed judge? Oh yeah, we're talking about Democrats, aren't we?

Monday, July 18, 2005

Who Holds The Future?

"We have staked the whole future of American civilization, not upon the power of government, far from it. We have staked the future of all our political institutions upon the capacity of mankind for self-government, upon the capacity for each and all of us to govern ourselves, to control ourselves, to sustain ourselves according to the Ten Commandments of God."

James Madison, Fourth President of the United States

Friday, July 15, 2005

The stupidity of the left

A must read is Victor David Hanson’s column Our Wars Over the War at National Review Online,

It covers the differing views on the Global War On Terror.

My View:

The stupidity of the left is astounding. It just baffles me how liberals are able to make it through the day without expiring from their lack of common sense.

Liberals, in case you didn’t know, terrorists want to kill you. Terrorists don’t care that you’re liberal. They don’t care that you feel a need to understand why they do what they do. They don’t care that you’re “tolerant”. They don’t care that in your own delusional world, you hate America.

Terrorists hate America and Americans more than you ever will. Nor do they care whether or not Karl Rove divulged the name of Valerie Plame as a C.I.A. Officer working undercover. Terrorists don’t care that Karl Rove drives lefty liberals insane.

Terrorists want nothing more than the opportunity to kill you just because you are an American. They think that is just a brainless group of Americans who are too cowardly to fight back.

Londoners are still grieving, and American liberals are still calling for the head of Karl Rove. Why isn’t calling for the heads of terrorists?

Thursday, July 14, 2005

Thursday's Thought

Political "moderate" is a liberal code word for a slower walk to tyranny.
— Dan Belcher

Thursday, July 07, 2005

Mass Murder

"It is important that those engaged in terrorism realise that our determination to defend our values and our way of life is greater than their determination to cause death and destruction to innocent people in a desire to impose extremism on the world. Whatever they do, it is our determination that they will never succeed in destroying what we hold dear in this country and in other civilised nations throughout the world." - - Tony Blair

Pray For The British People

America’s two best friends and allies in the world are Great Britain and Australia. I know that President Bush will make sure that America will continue to show that unique unity and brotherhood with Britain.

Wednesday, July 06, 2005


How low can liberals go?

Maybe the liberal motto should be: Reach High For The Curb!

Go to Michelle Malkin’s web page, to read (MOONBATS TARGET PROTEST WARRIOR) the latest on liberal criminal behavior. You can read the first hand account at the Protest Warrior web site.

Truly amazing.

Friday, July 01, 2005

Abortionist is too classy to eat meat

Krishna Rajanna, the abortionist from Kansas who recently lost his medical license and is accused of eating a fetus, (see the news story at apparently told the Kansas City Pitch Weekly that he would never eat a fetus, as meat makes him squeamish.

''This is outrageous,'' he said.

Wait a minute.

He willfully killed babies. And that was not outrageous?

He willfully killed babies. But a steak makes him squeamish?

I wonder how Molly Ivins or Maureen Dowd feel about this guy.

Are liberal’s views on the war on terror obtuse?

Read the opinion column by Molly Ivins titled: 'Liberal' views on war a figment posted today, 1, July 2005 on

At first I thought that this was just Ivins in her inimitable style. But then, change the byline to Maureen Dowd, John Kerry, Howard Dean or any other liberal, and you wouldn’t know the difference.

Hmmm, maybe Molly's style isn't inimitable after all.

Farewell Sandra Day O’Conner, Hello Messy Confirmation Fight

What will George W. Bush do?

Word has it that President Bush is leaning towards nominating current Attorney General Alberto Gonzales to replace Justice Sandra Day O’Conner. Scary stuff to consider. Gonzales doesn’t fill me with confidence. Especially with pro-life issues such as abortion, or issues concerning racial preferences, i.e., Affirmative Action.


“Supporters of a Gonzales nomination say that he would not be worse, and might even be better, than Justice Sandra Day O’Connor. But pro-lifers have voted for Republicans for two decades in the hope of improving the line-up of the Court, not of preserving it. To defend a Gonzales nomination on these grounds is to make an affirmative choice for three more decades of O’Connor-style jurisprudence. It would be to break faith with the president’s campaign promise.”

I agree.

We need change on the SCOTUS now, not more of the same.

NationalReviewOnline also wrote:

“The president has led an admirable campaign for a reformation of the federal judiciary. If he names a conservative nominee, he will have a battle on his hands. But it is a battle worth fighting. It is a battle he can win — and win in a way that lifts his fortunes across the board. Our bet is that it’s the battle Bush wants to wage.”

I hope NRO is right. It would be a battle that is indeed worth it.

As Carlos The Marine would say.

“No Guts, No Glory.”